Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf vs Victor Paganetti Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W W L
Form
W L W L L L L W W LHead To Head: Makhlouf 1 - 0 Paganetti
They have played 2 sets in total, with Makhlouf winning 2 and Paganetti winning 0. The last match between Makhlouf and Paganetti was at the M15 Monastir, 08-10-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf | 1 |
| Victor Paganetti | 0 |
M15 Monastir(08-10-2023)
| Makhlouf | Stats | Paganetti |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (19-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (2-3) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 28 | Age | 22 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 52% (148-135) | Career Total W/L | 25% (8-24) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Daniele Rapagnetta
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
42
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
Player
Matteo Fondriest
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
75
|
1-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Van Der Meerschen
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 7-6(5) 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Victor Paganetti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Esquici
Player
Victor Paganetti
50%
(
48 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
7
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-7(4) 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (148/135) | Win/Loss | 25% (8/24) |
| 53% (339/302) | Sets Win/Loss | 27% (18/48) |
| 51% (3109/2942) | Games Win/Loss | 39% (224/347) |
| 58% (109/80) | Hard Win/Loss | 29% (7/17) |
| 40% (33/49) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (6/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 368 | Aces Total | 24 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 317 | Total Double Faults | 44 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 97.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 194.5 |
| 60% (6004/10077) | 1st Serve % | 55% (369/667) |
| 63% (3801/6004) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (234/369) |
| 46% (1876/4073) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (120/298) |
| 44% (447/1011) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (15/44) |
| 40% (4097/10137) | Return Points Win % | 35% (215/616) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (148/133) | Futures W/L | 25% (8/24) |
| 52% (145/280) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (8/32) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (23/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 41% (30/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 86% (147/126) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (9/8) |
| 14% (147/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (9/1) |
| 15% (136/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (23/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
